On the occasion of the eviction of refugees and internally displaced persons from the unrecognized Collective Center "Pioneer City", Jasmina Mikovic, Praxis Deputy Executive Director, made a statement for Vecernje novosti Daily.

Read the news here.

On the occasion of the eviction of refugees and internally displaced persons from the unrecognized Collective Center "Pioneer City", Jasmina Mikovic, Praxis Deputy Executive Director, made a statement for Vecernje novosti Daily.

Read the news here.

In November, Praxis organized five trainings on anti-discrimination law in Belgrade, Novi Pazar, Novi Sad and Nis. The trainings were held together with the partner organization Equal Rights Trust (ERT) from London, with the support of the Commissioner for Protection of Equality, within the project Empowering Civil Society to Improve the Implementation of Anti-discrimination Laws in Serbia, supported by the European Union.

The first training was organized in Belgrade on 17-18 November 2014 in the premises of the National Assembly. It was primarily dedicated to lawyers dealing with anti-discrimination law. The goal of the training was to provide the participants with the knowledge about the national and international law, and strategic litigation for determination of discrimination. The training was led by Ivana Krstic (Faculty of Law of the University in Belgrade), Joanna Whiteman (ERT), Milica   Pavicevic (The Commissioner for Protection of Equality), lawyers Aleksandar Olenik and Violeta Kocic-Mitacek. The training was attended by the representatives of the persecution, public attorney’s office, the Ombudsperson, the Commissioner for Protection of Officer, Delegation of the European Union in Serbia and non-governmental organizations. The training consisted of the lecture about the legal framework on anti-discrimination, through illustrative examples from practice and exercises, aimed at practical application of knowledge and opening of a discussion. The participants had an opportunity to listen about anti-discrimination and strategic litigations from different perspectives: academic, non-governmental and that of independent institutions and lawyers.

This training was followed by trainings organized in Novi Pazar (20-21 November), Novi Sad (24-25 November) and Nis (27-28 November). These trainings were intended for activists of non-governmental organizations dealing with anti-discrimination and were led by Joanna Whiteman and Jim Fitzgerald (Equal Rights Trust), Ivana Stjelja (Praxis) and Rejhana Corovic, Lazar Rodic and Relja Pantic from the Office of the Commissioner for Protection of Equality.

In addition to the above stated trainings, on 26 November 2015 one more training was organized in Belgrade intended for media representatives. The training referred to the role of media in promotion of equality and was led by Vladimir Curgus (EBART),  Jim  Fitzgerald (Equal Rights Trust) and Danica Balaban (EBART). The participants talked about the principles of ethical reporting, different media reporting on children from different social groups and on discrimination in media based on national affiliation.

The trainings showed that discrimination is still an insufficiently explored issue, that term discrimination is often widely interpreted and often not recognized or wrongly understood in practice. The participants of trainings showed a great interest in this topic, especially in cases from practice. The conclusion of all trainings was that civil society needs to be more seriously empowered and informed about this subject and that such trainings are necessary. 

Download the report: Protecting the Rights of Migrants in the Republic of Serbia

Today we are marking the Human Rights Day and 66 years since the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This day should remind us that all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights, but also that there are those whose rights are violated and who need protection.

On this day we would thus like to point at the position of refugees and internally displaced persons accommodated in the informal Collective Centre “Pionirski grad”. Sixty three persons are being evicted at this moment. The evictions will be also carried out during winter, which is contrary to international standards binding on Serbia. The eviction of the CC “Pionirski Park” affects children, single parents, unemployed, socially vulnerable and persons of poor health, who are in constant fear and state of uncertainty, without durable and sustainable solution for their problems. We express sincere concern about the lack of understanding and will of the competent institutions to prevent homelessness, which for some is the only certain perspective. The authorities point out that the evictions are now unavoidable, but there will be opportunities for final resolving of their housing issue in the future.

Therefore, on this day we are calling on the authorities to urgently suspend the evictions during winter and find a durable and sustainable solution for refugees and internally displaced persons threatened with homelessness.

Statement by MODS

The Network of Organisations for the Children of Serbia (MODS) must respond to increasingly frequent appearances of Zoran Milivojević, who is known to the public for advocating corporal punishment of children and hate speech, which is especially illustrated by one of his recent statements given to the Novi Sad-based daily Dnevnik.

The Novi Sad-based daily Dnevnik published Mr. Milivojević’s statement that Roma children were doubly protected – for being children and for being Roma, and that therefore no one could do anything to them. Thus, he has criminalised an entire people, by vocalizing an opinion, which is discriminatory, to say the least, and basically labelled all members of the Roma minority. In doing so, he compares children with predators and gives himself the right to determine and speculate about the age limit for corporal punishment of children.

Using the media space, provided to him by the Politika daily, he continues to openly promote corporal punishment of children in Serbia presenting theses that are unsustainable and problematic, twisting the facts as he pleases without clear and logical consistency. So he first claims that there is no evidence that violence causes violence, and then makes the point that NON-VIOLENCE CAUSES VIOLENCE.

According to Milivojević, it seems that corporal punishment is the ONLY thing available to a parent in raising children and the only way for achieving parental authority! Only this totally disqualified Milivojević as a competent interlocutor on the issue of parenting. Milivojević consistently and erroneously equates the absence of corporal punishment with the so-called permissive parenting where “everything is permitted” to a child and parents are "powerless".

Milivojević persistently avoids talking about the abundance of ways to overcome difficulties in raising the child without beating. Such parenting may require more effort and a lot of patience, and sometimes may be harder.

In order to avoid judging what "permitted corporal punishment" and "abuse" are, violence should be prohibited by law and parents should be provided with great support in child raising, and genuine and real experts should be invited to help parents to provide better guidance to their children.

And we invite Mr. Zoran Milivojević to publicly apologise to the Roma community, parents and children for presenting discriminatory attitudes, hate speech, promoting violence and amateurish attitude towards the profession, parents and children.

We also invite professional associations, particularly the Union of Associations of Psychotherapists of Serbia, to distance from and condemn the statements and appearances of Zoran Milivojević, who violates the Code of Ethics of the Union by his actions and public appearance. Practicing psychotherapists know very well that they have a significant social responsibility because their recommendations and professional actions may alter the lives of others. Therefore, it is extremely unethical to recommend violence to parents as a way of solving problems that inevitably arise in child-raising, as Milivojević does. It is extremely unethical that professional associations remain silent to such statements and practice. We remind you that you as psychotherapists have committed to respect the integrity and protect the welfare of the persons with whom you work, to care about yourselves and others (physically, mentally), bearing in mind the uniqueness and worth of everyone. Are children less valuable and should we not respect their physical integrity?

More than 80 associations of citizens signed the Request for establishing responsibility and rectifying failures in the competition of the Ministry of Labour. The Request can still be signed by writing a mail to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .

Request

The Ministry of Labour, Employment, Veteran and Social Affairs (hereinafter referred to as the Ministry of Labour) announced a competition for grants for citizen associations in order to improve the social protection system. The competition was marked by numerous irregularities, including decisions on granting funds to a large number of newly registered associations (many of them just a month or less than a month before the competition), associations led by related persons (family members), associations led by local officials (primarily those from the Youth Office), associations that have identical statutes, including typographical errors and the like.

After the public has justifiably pointed out the irregularity of the competition and the obvious attempt of the embezzlement of taxpayers' money, the Minister of Labour Aleksandar Vulin attacked the entire civil sector, threatening with inspections and controls of the operations performed in the last 10 years and finally, completely illegally and without authorisation, stated that he had decided to direct the money earmarked for social protection services to the Fund for Treatment of Children with Rare Diseases.

The associations of citizens, signatories to this request, urge the competent authorities to do the following:

1. Cancel the irregular competition and announce new one, in accordance with the budget of the Republic of Serbia and the planned policy of the Government of the Republic of Serbia. The beneficiaries of social protection services cannot be deprived of the funds that have already been earmarked in the budget for that purpose. As regards the Fund for Treatment of Children with Rare Diseases, the Government of the Republic of Serbia needs to find a systemic solution and resources from the budget lines designated for this purpose instead of usurping arbitrarily the funds intended for social protection beneficiaries.
   

2. Initiate ex officio investigations and prosecute effectively all those who are responsible for the attempted misuse of taxpayers' money. The Prosecutor’s Office is obliged to act ex officio in this case and to examine reasonable suspicion that this was a well-organised group that attempted to appropriate money from the budget and whose members are from the relevant state and local institutions and newly established associations of citizens.

3. Urgently dismiss Minister Aleksandar Vulin. The Government of the Republic of Serbia must initiate a procedure for the replacement of the Minister of Labour because of his undoubted political responsibility in this case. Not only did Minister Vulin fail to respond adequately to the irregularities in the competition, but attacked the civil sector and announced unlawful decisions, such as redirection of these funds to the Fund for Treatment of Children. The amendments of budget are the responsibility of the Assembly of Serbia and Mr. Vulin cannot dispose at his discretion with the money of the citizens of Serbia in any case or make decisions about its reallocation.

The associations of citizens, signatories to the request, warn the Government of the Republic of Serbia that such behaviour is detrimental, both to Serbia’s finances and the rule of law, and to the development of civil sector, but also to the system of support to young people in Serbia through local youth offices and to the development of the whole society. The responsibility lies with the Government of the Republic of Serbia and the Prosecutor's Office, which must take the measures prescribed by law. Associations of citizens will not give up their demands and will use all legal means available to defend the rule of law and freedom of association in Serbia.

The list of signatory organisations and more detailed information can be found on the website of Policy Center.

Blog by Bojana Balević, Gender Equality Programme Coordinator

Since a few years ago every 25th November has been marked in Serbia as the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women. This day is marked not only by the civil sector, as it was in the beginning, but it has now become a practice of public authorities and institutions. In the period 25 November-10 December, during the campaign 16 Days of Activism, a large number of conferences, performances, public debates and other events will be organised to address the following topics: violence against women, disadvantaged position of women, social contexts leading to that, etc. Civil society representatives will once again present data and examples from practice illustrating the situation of women's rights; state representatives will confirm whether there is room for improvement, that there are differences in the position of men and women - primarily economic, but will also stress that Serbia does not lag behind the developed countries to a great extent, that the situation in the European countries is similar, that there are some worse than us.

However, the life before and after the campaign tells us that all those things debated during the campaign are changing slowly, and that in some segments there is stagnation and even regression.

The current situation in judiciary is such that the procedures in which women seek protection from violence are unacceptably lengthy. Thus, for example, it takes one year on average to issue an indictment for the crime of domestic violence after the filing of criminal charges. The criminal proceedings, depending on the type of crime, last from one year to as long as four years. The reasons for lengthy court proceedings are numerous, and we have most frequently encountered these: inability of delivering summons for the main hearing to the accused, scheduling main hearings at intervals of one to several months, non-attendance of summoned witnesses, delay in submission and submission of incomplete findings and opinions of expert witnesses in relation to the types and severity of injuries, etc. This period of time leaves room to the abuser to stalk the victim forcing her to withdraw from the proceedings. Besides the length of proceedings, victims of domestic violence were often dissatisfied with the judgments by which, in most cases, a suspended sentence was pronounced to perpetrators. According to the Criminal Procedure Code, the injured party does not have a possibility to appeal against judgement when the public prosecutor considers that it is not necessary. In cases where a suspended sentence is pronounced, the victim of violence simply cannot influence the altering of sentence. In cases where victims of violence had property claims in criminal proceedings, the court usually instructed them to initiate a civil procedure to exercise that right, which practically delays for several years the completion of all procedures relating to domestic violence.

As regards civil procedures for the purpose of exercising the right to protection from domestic violence, the situation is no better. On average, somewhat more than a year passes from the moment of filing the lawsuit to the final judgment, which constitutes a serious violation of legal provisions. In fact, the majority of civil procedures in which we have represented victims of domestic violence are those related to family relationships, which were urgent under the Law on Family. That means that there will be, as a rule, a maximum of two hearings within the civil procedure, whereas the first hearing is convened so as to be held within 15 days of lawsuit and request being received by the court, and the appellate court is obliged to render a decision within 30 days of filing an appeal. Even when the right to judicial protection is exercised, i.e. when the measures of protection against domestic violence are imposed, it does not mean the end of troubles for individual victims of violence. For example, we had a case that measures of protection against domestic violence were imposed on the abuser: measure of eviction from the home, restraining order at a distance of 150 metres around the place of work and residence, and the prohibition of any further harassment. However, every day he parked his car in front of the house from which he had been evicted at a distance greater than prescribed and observed the victim. The police did not react to calls; they said that their hands were tied and that they could only talk to try to persuade the abuser not to do that again. They went so far as to say to the victim that they did not understand why it bothered her when the abuser was doing nothing. In the event that the abuser violates the court order and does not comply with the imposed measures of protection against domestic violence, new criminal charges are filed and another court procedure is initiated, exhausting for the victim of violence.

All this is especially important to mention in the light of the fact that Serbia ratified the Istanbul Convention, which entered into force on 1 August 2014. As a reminder, the Republic of Serbia has made a reservation in respect of two members of the Istanbul Convention. Article 3 of the Law on Ratification of the Convention reads: "The Republic of Serbia reserves the right not to apply the provisions of Article 30 paragraph 2 and Article 44, paragraph 1 point e), paragraph 3 and paragraph 4 of the Convention until it has harmonised its national criminal legislation with these provisions of the Convention."

The Istanbul Convention requires the States Parties to be guided by the due diligence standard in the prevention, protection, prosecution and punishment of acts of violence.

In the field of protection of the victims of violence, the state should ensure to place the needs and safety of victims in the focus of all measures and to prosecute and adequately punish the perpetrators of violence against women. This means that the states are obliged to take necessary legislative or other measures and to ensure that victims have adequate civil legal remedies against perpetrators, but also against public authorities that have failed to respond to violence in accordance with their powers. More specifically, the States Parties are expected to harmonise their legislations with the provisions of the Convention, and the Convention envisaged, inter alia, the following: introduction of criminal offence of stalking in domestic legislation; introduction of urgent measures for protection from violence (granting the power to the competent authorities to order to the perpetrator, in situations of imminent danger, to vacate the residence of the victim for a sufficient period of time and to prohibit the perpetrator from entering the residence or contacting the victim), to ensure the right to legal assistance and free legal aid to the victim in accordance with national legislation and others. In that process of protecting victims the state should create a system to protect at all times the rights and interests of the victim in order to prevent them from being exposed to secondary victimisation.

Serbia is still without the Law on Legal Aid; stalking is not defined as a crime in our legislation; there are no urgent protection measures that may be imposed by the competent authority, but they have to be sought in court. It should also be noted that the judicial system in Serbia has been blocked for more than two months because the Ministry of Justice did not find a way to solve the problem faced by the legal profession and (in)directly by citizens.

Moreover, in Serbia there is a lack of services for victims of violence - hotlines, shelters for victims of violence, crisis centres for rape victims and others.

Combating violence against women is not just immediate protection but primarily work on the prevention and elimination of harmful gender stereotypes and prejudices, customs and traditions, which are based on the idea of the inferiority of women or the application of stereotypical gender roles.

The question is whether, in this retraditionalisation of social relations that we have been witnessing in recent years, we as a society can respond to the challenges and protect the most vulnerable?

No child chooses to be stateless. It is a fundamental truth that every child belongs – to this world, to a place and to a community – and this should be recognised through the enjoyment of a nationality. Yet statelessness continues to arise because European states are failing to ensure that all children born within Europe’s borders or to European citizen parents acquire a nationality.

The European Network on Statelessness (ENS) advocates as one of its central tenets that none of Europe’s children should be stateless. Childhood statelessness stands at odds with the right of every child to a nationality, as laid down in the Convention on the Rights of the Child – adopted 25-years ago today. ENS is taking the occasion of this anniversary to launch its new region-wide campaign which will raise awareness and promote measures to ensure that all children born in Europe or to European parents outside the region can in practice realise their right to a nationality.

Earlier this year, ENS released a report on Childhood statelessness in Europe: Issues, gaps and good practices. This report concluded that although most of Europe’s nationality laws notionally include safeguards to protect against the risk of statelessness, in reality children continue to be born stateless across the region. Many have inherited their statelessness from parents who were stateless before them while others are the first in their family to experience statelessness, as the unsuspecting victim of a gap or conflict in nationality laws.

ENS’s research identified a worrying array of problems in the finer details of many nationality laws as well as in the laws governing procedures for birth registration, which helps to establish and document a child’s nationality. Numerous countries have failed to include basic safeguards in the law, such as to grant nationality to a child born on the territory who would otherwise be stateless, or to a child who has been abandoned and whose parents are unknown. Even where laws do provide a remedy against childhood statelessness, there are signs that the safeguards do not always work in practice, for instance because these special rules are not widely known or there are no guidelines on how and when to apply them.

As a result of these and other gaps in the way European states are currently addressing the issue of childhood statelessness, thousands of children who have strong and clear connections to Europe are growing up without the protection or sense of belonging which a nationality bestows. ENS is committed to helping to change this picture by: raising awareness on the importance of and measures to prevent childhood statelessness, working with the child rights community to foster a more active engagement on the issue of children’s right to a nationality and promote relevant international standards, conducting further research in order to fully identify what gaps exist in law, policy and practice and developing a better understanding of how problematic birth registration procedures are connected to issues of childhood statelessness. Through these activities, the ENS campaign aims to strengthen frameworks for the prevention of statelessness among Europe’s children.

If this goal can be realised, it will help bring Europe an important step closer towards ending statelessness in the region by 2024 – the goal set by the UN Refugee Agency’s #ibelong initiative. There is much work to be done to meet this ambitious objective but a key challenge will be to prevent new cases of statelessness from occurring, in essence to stop the spread of the problem. With its campaign, ENS seeks to contribute to this crucial first step.

On the occasion of the Universal Children’s Day and celebration of 25 years since the adoption of the Convention on the Rights of the Child of the United Nations, Praxis once again draws attention to the promotion of the rights of the child and care of children, which need to be the most important priority for the state.

Praxis reminds that despite the fact that the importance of respecting the rights of the child in Serbia has become more visible over the past years, the state still fails to invest enough efforts in order to improve the legal and institutional framework, so that every child may equally enjoy the rights guaranteed by the Constitution, laws, the Convention of the Rights of the Child, and other international treaties ratified by the Republic of Serbia.

There are still legally invisible children in Serbia today, who have no access to rights, as a consequence of violation of the Article 7 of the Convention of the Rights of the Child, which envisages that the child shall be registered immediately after birth and shall have the right from birth to a name and the right to acquire a nationality

Even though discrimination is prohibited by the Constitution and the law, it is however widespread, especially against the Roma children and children with disabilities. Children from vulnerable social groups are still facing many problems, especially in access to the rights to education, health care and social protection. The best interest of a child is also fully neglected in media coverage, and the percentage of children who are exposed to some form of abuse is still very high.

To ensure the guarantee and protection of the rights of the child in all spheres of social life for every child, we remind the state of the importance of adoption of the Law on the Rights of the Child, the Law on the Ombudsperson of Children’s Rights and Rules of detailed criteria for identifying of discrimination by an employee, a student or a third party in educational institutions, and the necessity of engaging all levels of the government.